Comments for Flash Port Bounty at http://www.haikuware.com , comment 0 to 13 out of 13 comments http://www.haikuware.com Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:47:26 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1290 Well a fully working, bug free, GCC 2/4 hybrid build of haiku is need to port boost. And that would be Haiku-alpha1. - sjusen Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:40:03 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1289 Porting boost i'ts good idea. I think however, that on any workings on this subject(boost, gnash etc.) we have to wait on release alpha Haiku. - MaxOS Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:05:56 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1282 Someone Should push the guys at haiku ports to port boost, I think that is the main thing stopping any Gnash port. Also porting boost would help more than just a Gnash port but in fact many files. - sjusen Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:20:24 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1275 Wow, still no taker for the Flash port. There's gotta be someone who would like to take this on... - thenerd Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:54:07 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1072 I agree with Anders too. mmu_man: but perhaps gcc4 after last changes in Haiku is standard... maybe... or not? - MaxOS Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:02:05 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1070 I must agree with Anders on this. According to the thread he linked to it doesn't look very optimistic so maybe this will help that. There's nothing stopping the current flash porter to apply for the bounty. - thenerd Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:36:47 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1069 mmu_man: It's meant to help anybody who wants to give us a working flash implementation on Haiku, whether it's based on the existing Gnash port, a new Gnash port or swfdec. Regarding the existing Gnash port, it seems like the porter himself isn't too optimistic about it (but it mayb be that I've missed something): http://www.haikuware.com/forum/bounty-discussion/321-reflash-support#288 - anders Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:31:46 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1068 I'm not sure if that's so useful. If it's meant to help the existing Gnash porter (yes there is a working BeOS port, but it is not stable yet) then fine, but there is no need for someone else to pick it up and dump what has already been done on it. He had to write code to emulate Boost because this huge thing doesn't support gcc2 anymore. As for swfdec, I've looked into it, and it has far too many dependancies (including some requiring gcc4), and even more last time I checked than previously. - mmu_man Mon, 16 Jun 2008 05:54:53 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1052 Also don't miss this thread: http://www.haikuware.com/forum/bounty-discussion/321-reflash-support#321 - anders Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:05:54 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1051 I'm not a developer, but I wouldn't be surprised if Boost isn't likely pre-Haiku 2, considering its scope. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boost_C++_Libraries I don't think the Haiku team wants to extend the Haiku libs this way. But again, these are only my non-developer guesses. - anders Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:04:40 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1050 interesting comments indeed. What exactly is boost if I may ask? - thenerd Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:57:15 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1049 Interesting opinions: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnash-dev/2008-06/msg00075.html - MaxOS Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:02:09 +0100 http://www.haikuware.com/flash-port-bounty#pc_1038 Wow you guys are quick ;) Thanks for the donations so far. This could be an interesting one ;D - karl Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:54:24 +0100